Portrait of Peg

Peg, 2017 digital, from scratch
Peg, 2017 digital, from scratch
Peg, 2017 digital, from scratch

This is my wife Peg.  We’ve been married for 35 years.  She still has that great smile, a window into who she is.

I’ve been learning how to use a Wacom table to draw and paint.  This is my second portrait. I am using the tablet with GNU editor.  I am not copying, just drawing and painting, creating colors of my own.  

 

 

Loving Vincent – Pictures of his life

Van Gogh As Young Man, pencil

“Loving Vincent” is a flick about Vincent Van Gogh made entirely of paintings done in his thick paint, swirly, expressive style.  There are 65,000 paintings in all, each done on glass plates.  The plates were first placed before the filmed of the costumed cast members, reducing drawing time dramatically, and making it possible to make this movie with just 125 and not, say, the 10,000 artists it would have taken to cover an area the size of London or Manhattan if each plate were laid out in the original size.  All this adds up to an unusual experience and a total immersion in the visual world of the artist.  But there’s more.

The film could have suffered significantly from the flaw that plagues musicals, whose stories often serve as an excuse for the next number.  Loving Vincent’s story line, however, is not so thin.  Its basis is writing that challenges the initial contention that Van Gogh committed suicide. 

The movie opens with the postman possessing a returned letter addressed to Vincent’s brother Theo.  He recruits his son Armand to hand deliver the letter.  Armand soon finds that Theo is dead, so he looks for an alternative.  The film is a series of interviews of the people who knew Vincent, all portrait subjects, interviews that further what turns into an investigation of the death of the artist.  As things unfold we are provided a picture of the life of Vincent as well as his death, some interviewees corroborating the suicide theory, while others leave us doubting that verdict.

Several issues emerge that lead us to question the suicide conclusion.  Having pulled that trigger you would have left black powder marks on your clothes and hands, and the accounts show conflicts in that regard.  Also we are told of the persistent ridicule and bullying by town youths, any one of which could have had motive, perhaps even the one who later confessed to mistreating Vincent in his youth.  Then there is Vincent’s state of mind.  “Loving Vincent” is what Van Gogh wrote in each of his letters to his brother Theo, with whom he had a close relationship.  Thus Vincent was not entirely alone and unloved by family, and he was close to some of the interviewees as well.  

There are several other observations of interest.  First, Vincent wrote, “I want to touch people with my art.  I want them to say:  he feels deeply, he feels tenderly.”   Are those the sentiments of someone who would end his own life?  Perhaps but perhaps not.  Second, Vincent’s lack of commercial success could certainly contribute to his perception of self-worth.  However Monet, the most famous of painters,  had recently highly praised Vincent’s art, and Vincent sold a painting, his first.  Third there is the odd location and angle of the lethal wound.  People who attempt suicide with a gun usually go for the head not the stomach.  None of these observations are conclusive of course, but there is certainly enough to cloud the official verdict, and to give substance to what would otherwise be an art slide show with an excuse for a story.

The colored images flicker in a way that other animations I have seen do not, adding an element of visual intrigue to that surrounding conflicting images of Vincent’s life and death.  They also add an element of brain fatigue.  Fortunately the flash backs in black and white give much-needed rest for the eyes. 

This is a unique film about a unique man making unique art.  Check it out – and stay through the credits.  You’ll be treated to Lianne La Havas’s deep toned charming rendition of Starry Starry Night.  

Rotten Tomatoes reviews      Robert Kodger review  Tim Brayton review  Vanity Fair: The Van Gogh Mystery

__________________

A friend and I went to Auvers-sur-Oise, which is not too far from Paris.  It is here that Vincent Van Gogh lived his last months.  While he lived in this town Van Gogh did a painting of the church,  now one of his more famous paintings among the 800 he squeezed into his short life.   Here is my rendition, in memory of this man who contributed so much to art and who received so little in return. 

 

Church at Avers sur Oise: Ode to Vincent, waatercolor, 11.5 x 16.5", 30 x 42 cm
Church at Avers sur Oise: Ode to Vincent, watercolor, 11.5 x 16.5″, 30 x 42 cm, $450

Church at Avers sur Oise, graphite
Church at Avers sur Oise
Church at Avers Sur Oise, water color

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The first of the following drawings I did at the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam, which displayed a photo of a young Van Gogh.  This and other early photos are a stark contrast to the gaunt and haunted look of Vincent’s later self portraits, which are widely seen.  Here is a more rare glimpse of the man.  

Van Gogh As Young Man, pencil
Van Gogh As Young Man, pencil

 

Van Gogh As Young Man, pen and ink
Van Gogh As Young Man, pen and ink

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Portrait of Peasant, after the Van Gogh, pen and ink
Portrait of Peasant, after the Van Gogh, pen and ink

 

 

In case you need a touching moment, here’s Lianne’s rendition of Starry Starry Night.  Don Mclean gave light to this song that will live as one of the most touching eulogies of all time, whose disturbed mind gave us so much beauty, so much innovation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nicholas Roerich

Nicholas Roerich  (1874 St Petersburg-1947 Nagar India) was the teacher of a British American named Ralph Houstin, whom I followed during my Buddhist years.  He was a noted as a proponent of peace, painter, writer, archaeologist, and a theosophist.  He was born to a well-to-do family, and graduated from both art and law school.  He directed Imperial Society for the Encouragement of the Arts,  from 1906 to 1917.   He was President of the “World of Art” society from 1910 to 1916.  Later he earned nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize long list, and the Roerich Pact was signed by the United States in April 1935.  Formally entitled the Treaty on the Protection of Artistic and Scientific Institutions and Historic Monuments,  it commits signatories to the preservation of cultural heritage in time of war.

Nicholas Roerich
Nicholas Roerich I did this from a portrait in Borse Musem 

Nicolas also was a stage designer.   Diaghilev’s “Ballet Russes”,  Borodin’s “Prince Igor,” and Stravinsky’s magnificent “Rite of Spring ” (both costumes and set) are on his list of credits.

Roerich engaged in a number of expeditions in Asia, and at one point was detained by the government for five months in Tibet under harsh winter conditions.   I read his account in a book called, “Altai Himalya.”  His purposes appear to have been archaeological but he asked for and received support from the Bolshevik government, promising to keep on eye on the British.   He resided in the U.S. in the run up to WWII, becoming close to Henry Wallace, V.P. under Roosevelt and later a presidential candidate, who was a fan of both Roerich and his wife Helena, whose letters were published.

The Nicholas Roerich Museum in New York City is a major repository of his c work.   Roerich societies continue to promote his mystical teachings.

His paintings are in the Roerich Musem, the  Department of the State Museum of Oriental Arts in Moscow, the Roerich Museum at the International Centre in Moscow and the the Russian State Museum in Saint Petersburg, Russia.  There is a collection in the Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow, in the Art Museum in Novosibirsk, Russia, the National Gallery for Foreign Art in SofiaBulgaria, the Art Museum in Nizhny Novgorod Russia, the National Museum of Serbia,  the Roerich Hall Estate in NaggarIndia, the Sree Chitra Art GalleryThiruvananthapuram, India;[17] and several of his larger works in The Latvian National Museum of Art.  I did the drawing you see here at the Borsa Museum in Riga, Latvia, at a temporary exhibit of this work.  

In June 2013 his Madonna Laboris sold at auction £7,881,250, the highest price ever for Russian art at auction.  This piece, like so many, are in a dreamy purple haze with strong religious overtones. 

 

Madona Laboris
Madona Laboris

Couple in Vilnius

 

Among the notable things in Vilnius, the capitol of Lithuania,  are the spires and the architecture, featured in the background of this painting.  Lithuania is nominally a Roman Catholic country, with 75% of the population purportedly members.  However the statistics show that half the population does not believe in the Christian deity.  I have portrayed the irony of this apparent contradiction through the unusual placement and distortion of the spires, which serve at once to unite and divide the couple.

Couple in Vilnius, acrylics on paper, 11.7 x 16.5", A4 30 x 42 cm
Couple in Vilnius, acrylics on paper, 11.7 x 16.5″, A4 30 x 42 cm

 

Artemesia Gentileschi, one of the best painters of the 1600’s and among the world’s best

Artemesia Gentileschi, one of few women painters in the 1600’s, and among the finest of either sex.

Born in Florence in the Baroque era, Artemesia (1593 – c. 1656) was one of the finest painters of her day, and the only one of her sex to achieve recognition.  She was the first woman to become a member of the Accademia di Arte del Disegno in Florence was employed by patrons from the Papal states Italy, Naples, and England.   Her father Orazio was also very well known and respected as a painter, sharing his knowledge with her  from an early age, yet for years they were estranged until possibly near the very end of his life when they worked together in London for the royal family. 

Her most famous painting is Judith Slaying Holofernes, a bloody affair that demonstrates her powerful use of light and shadow allo Caravaggio.  She made use of her own image in this and many of other paintings.

Judith Slaying Holofernes
Susanna and the Elders (1610). She was 17

Her success was threatened in the earlier years by the crime to which she was subject, and the subsequent trial.  In 1611 at age 18 she was raped by Agostino Tassi, a painter Orazio hired to tutor her.   At that time if you were raped and the rapist promised to marry you, rape was acceptable provided the promise was kept.  She continued having sex with Tassi but he reneged on the marriage commitment – her continued relations with him was not considered exculpatory of his behavior.  At the time he was still married and having a sexual relation with his sister in law as well.  Part of the trial ordeal was a required gynecological exam.  In addition all witnesses had to undergo torture.  Their testimony would be deemed credible if they did not change their story.  The prosecution was carried out not by her but her father as women did not have standing in these matters.  Tassi was found guilty and sentenced to five years or banishment from Rome.  He chose the former.

 

 

My Ode to Artesimia, acrylics on acrylic paper, 21 x 29.7 cm, 8.3 x 1
St Cecilia Playing a Lute

She handles light beautifully, her underlying drawings are magnificent.  

Lucretia

She married a Florentine artist recommended to her by a friend, to which her father grudgingly assented, as was required if she were to marry anyone.  Pierantonio Stiattessi was also a painter but not of her stature.  He helped her get commissions, fathered their daughter Prudentia but later became a burden.  They spent most of her married years apart despite a very good beginning.  During these early years in Florence she was accepted into the prestigious Accademia di Arte del Disegno, which also required the approval of her father.  During this period Michelangelo Buonarrot, the Michelangelo’s nephew, asked her and other artists to contribute a painting to the house he was building to honor his uncle.  

Allegory of the Inclination (natural talent)
Allegory of the Inclination

Her letters reveal a love affair with a wealthy Florentine named Maringhi .  Her husband wrote to her lover in friendly terms using the backside of her love letters.  Perhaps Maringhi provided financial or other forms of assistance. By 1621 she and her husband were no longer cohabiting, and she had returned to Rome.  She found less success there than in Florence, and by 1630 she moved to Naples, finding lucrative work with the Viceroy.  In 1638 she went to London to help her father with a ceiling for which he had been commissioned. 

In Alexandra LaPierre’s Artemesia their reunion was awkward at best, coming after 25 years of separation.  LaPierre portrays Orazio as fearful of being outranked by his daughter.  By 1642 she had finished the work he had been hired to do,  leaving England some two years following her father’s sudden death in 1639.  She disappears from the records until 1648, when she is back in Naples

While it is true that there were few women painters in this period, there were others.  Italians of the era were Sofonisba Anguissola, Lavinia Fontana, and Fede Galizia.  Per LaPierre, Artemesia’s success in Naples encouraged a number of female competitors.  

Judith and Her Maid Servant
Judith and Her Maid Servant.  Her treatment of robes is as good as anyone’s.

Most of her paintings feature women as protagonists.  While most women were portrayed demurely, her’s were strong and uninhibited, and making a mark in history.  

For a broader view of women in art in that era see the video by Art Historian Dr. Vida Hull

[embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KldzQxoS5-U[/embedyt]

There is a good article on wiki if you want more information.   wiki on Artemisia Gentileschi  I highly recommend LaPierre’s historical novel referenced above.  There a very good video on youtube.   The producer expresses outrage at the lack of exposure of this fine painter.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoYF2rjCG68